mitochondrial-dna

You are currently browsing articles tagged mitochondrial-dna.

ResearchBlogging.orgSvante Pääbo’s group at the Max Plank Institute have a paper coming out in the February issue of Cell Biology. In it, they describe sequencing a complete early human mitochondrial genome from the Markina Gora specimen from the Kostenki 14 site in Russia. The remains date to around 30,000 years ago, not the oldest human sequence, but interesting nonetheless because the authors have identified new ways to determine if ancient DNA sequences are genuine vs. contamination.  This is especially important for more anatomically modern human fossils, who may have similar sequences to extant populations.

For Neandertal mtDNA, identifying contamination is relatively simple, because their mtDNA sequences fall outside the range of variation found in modern humans. Not so for more recent fossils.  So how can researchers identify true archaic sequences?

fragment length, deamination-induced sequence errors at ends of molecules, and purine-associated fragmentation represent features by which endogenous and contaminating populations of DNA molecules can be distinguished in at least some late Pleistocene specimens (1).

So, fragments sequenced from ancient samples are typically shorter than modern contaminants.  In many cases, the fragments are shorter than what can be amplified using PCR, meaning high-throughput direct sequencing methods are required to analyze these ancient samples.  In addition, the cytosine bases at the 5′ ends of ancient DNA fragments are susceptible to deamination (removal of an -NH3 group), causing those bases to be misread as thymine. The 3′ ends of ancient sequences have a commensurate increase in G-A errors. Finally, fragmentation of ancient sequences occurs more frequently at purine bases (guanine and adenine).

With these criteria in mind, the researchers determined that the Markina Gora sequence belongs to mitochondrial haplogroup U2, a haplogroup still present in Europe today.

Figure 3D from Krause et al. (2010) - with the EMH sequence highlighted in red.

The authors determine that it is unlikely that this sequence is the result of modern contamination, because the nucleotide difference between the Markina Gora specimen and the ancestral U sequence is much shorter than than seen between the root and modern sequences, which have accumulated many more mutations over time.  Their results also support the hypothesis of pre-agricultural genetic continuity in Europe, so that genetic lineages which were present on the continent prior to the Neolithic transition can still be found in modern European populations.

Krause J, Briggs AW, Kircher M, Maricic T, Zwyns N, Derevianko A, & Pääbo S (2009). A Complete mtDNA Genome of an Early Modern Human from Kostenki, Russia. Current biology : CB PMID: 20045327

ResearchBlogging.orgIn June, Gilbert et al published “Intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of Siberian woolly mammoths using complete mitochondrial genomes.”  While the sample size is necessarily small, given the age, the study presents five new complete mitochondrial sequences dating from 14,000 to greater than 63,000 years ago.

Recovery sites of mammoth hair samples for mtDNA sequencing. Red samples indicate those sequenced for the present study.

The authors note that three of the sequences represent a distinct clade of mammoths (red circles) found between the Lena and Kolyma rivers in Siberia, which apparently went extinct some 30,000 years prior to their counterparts elsewhere.  This study demonstrates application of the 454 technology outside hominin evolution, as well as the wealth of data on species diversity available in ancient samples.


Gilbert, M., Drautz, D., Lesk, A., Ho, S., Qi, J., Ratan, A., Hsu, C., Sher, A., Dalen, L., Gotherstrom, A., Tomsho, L., Rendulic, S., Packard, M., Campos, P., Kuznetsova, T., Shidlovskiy, F., Tikhonov, A., Willerslev, E., Iacumin, P., Buigues, B., Ericson, P., Germonpre, M., Kosintsev, P., Nikolaev, V., Nowak-Kemp, M., Knight, J., Irzyk, G., Perbost, C., Fredrikson, K., Harkins, T., Sheridan, S., Miller, W., & Schuster, S. (2008). Intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of Siberian woolly mammoths using complete mitochondrial genomes Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (24), 8327-8332 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802315105

JesusFamilyTomb.com

We watched the Discovery Channel special last night, and the Ted Koppel hosted discussion afterward. For those who may have missed it, the film examines evidence from a tomb first discovered in 1980 during construction of an apartment complex in Jerusalem. Construction was temporarily halted while archaeologists retrieved the contents and made an archaeological record of site. 10 ossuaries, small limestone boxes used to store the bones of the dead after decomposition, were found in the tomb which was dated to the 1st century. The Israel Antiquity Authority had 9 of the 10 ossuaries in storage (one was never received, or has since been lost). 6 of them were inscribed with names the filmmakers claim can be linked to the genealogy of Jesus, including:

  • Maria – a Latinized form of Mary
  • Matthew – a name common in Jesus’ maternal lineage
  • Simon
  • Jesus son of Joseph – in Aramaic
  • Mariamne – in Greek, and a name reportedly used for Mary Magdalene in the Acts of Phillip (her brother)
  • Judah son of Jesus – the most decorated ossuary

I now understand some of the criticism that has been leveled against the docudrama. As a scientist, it bothers me that a “journalist/filmmaker” went down in the tomb without any scientific backup. I think this lack of scientific rigor is a detriment to the overall hypothesis. At this point, even if the filmmakers are correct, or even on the right track, they’ve given their detractors too much ammunition to tear their hypothesis down thanks to their sloppy science.

Read the rest of this entry »

Blog Widget by LinkWithin